|
Faculty Committee on Rights and Responsibilities
Procedures Governing
Personnel Recommendations
and
Other Agenda Items
Sec.
1. Definitions.
(a)
All
references to the Board in this legislation are to the Review and Appeals
Board.
(b)
All
references to By-laws are to the By-Laws of the Academic Council.
(c)
All
references to the chair are to the chair of the Review and Appeals Board
(d)
All
references to the department are to the department initiating the
personnel recommendation. In cases in which a college, program, or ad hoc
committee makes or joins in the recommendation, references to the department
also pertain to it.
Sec.
2. Meetings and Agendas.
Consistent with Sec. 206 of the by-laws, the chair of the Board shall
distribute agendas, notices, and related materials to Board members at least
five days ahead of scheduled meetings. The chair shall consult with the chairs
of the Advisory Committee and the department in scheduling the date and
approximate time when each personnel recommendation will be reviewed. In
consultation with the Academic Secretary, the chair shall establish procedures
for notifying invited departmental visitors regarding the date and time they
should appear and for sending them personnel materials. Departmental visitors
will typically attend only for the duration of the review of the personnel
recommendation they have initiated.
Sec.
3. Presentation of a Personnel Recommendation Conferring Tenure, Following a
Positive Recommendation by the Advisory Committee.
This section applies to
both positive and negative department recommendations.
(a)
The
motion on the floor is concurrence with the positive recommendation of the
Advisory Committee.
(b)
The
normal order of presentation and discussion is as follows:
1. Identification
of the referees’ letters by the Academic Secretary.
2.
A
statement from an Advisory Committee representative on the Committee’s
recommendation.
3.
A
statement from a department representative on the department’s recommendation.
4.
Additional statements from other members of the department.
5.
General discussion, which shall include opportunity for comment in turn
on each of the three canonical categories germane to a recommendation:
scholarship, teaching, and colleagueship.
6.
In consultation with the President or his or her designated
representative, the chair may modify the normal order of the presentation.
7.
The chair may establish time limits for the presentations numbered 2-4
above.
(c)
The Board shall vote on the motion for concurrence by written ballot.
Sec.
4. Presentation of a Personnel Recommendation Not Newly Conferring Tenure,
Following a Positive Recommendation by the Advisory Committee. This section
applies to both positive and negative department recommendations. For cases not
conferring tenure, there is no motion for concurrence with the recommendation of
the Advisory Committee. The Board discusses the recommendation but does not
vote. The normal order of presentation of the case follows that of Sec. 3(b)
above.
Sec. 5. Presentation of a departmental appeal of a
negative recommendation of the Advisory Committee. This section applies to
both recommendations conferring tenure and promotions not conferring tenure.
(a)
The motion on the floor is concurrence with the negative recommendation
of the Advisory Committee.
(b)
The normal order of presentation and discussion is the same as detailed
in Sec. 3(b) above.
(c)
Deliberation on the motion will follow the “Standing Rules Governing
the Appeals Procedures in the Review and Appeals Board” adopted by the
Academic Council, May 8, 2001 and any other such procedures that the Academic
Council may subsequently adopt.
(d)
The Board
shall vote on the motion for concurrence by written ballot.
Sec.
6. Reports to the Academic Council. Pursuant
to Sec. 103 of the by-laws, the chair of the Board shall consult with the chair
and vice-chair of the Advisory Committee on the form of the mandated reports to
the Academic Council.
Approved
by the Review and Appeals Board, November 27, 2001as Board regulations. The
regulations were placed before the Academic Council on December 11, 2001. The
Council received the regulations without comment.
|