|
STUDENT CONDUCT - The Honor System
STANDARDS OF CONDUCT
PLAGIARISM
The Honor Code to which students subscribe upon
entering Wesleyan is merely a special application of the unwritten code that
governs all academic and scholarly affairs. Scholars on whatever level must
represent their findings truthfully. This means, first, that they will not
tamper with the truth as they see it. It means, second, that they will not offer
as theirs what others discovered or wrote—will not be guilty of plagiarism.
These responsibilities apply equally of professor, researcher, and student.
Nearly all Wesleyan students mean to be honest, but some do not appreciate the
extent to which plagiarism is dishonest. It is important to recognize that
plagiarism is theft, not of ideas, which are in a sense the property of
everyone, but of the credit for originating ideas. Plagiarism is also
fraud—intentional deception in order to obtain what does not rightfully belong
to one—for a student who plagiarizes attempts to get from the instructor an
unearned grade and from the University an unearned degree. And, of course, the
plagiarist also affronts the rest of the student body. Plagiarism, finally, is
impersonation, since every piece of written work presents an image of its
author.
For this last reason, plagiarism is particularly
damaging to the plagiarist. Just as an impersonator may get lost among assumed
roles, a plagiarist will almost certainly have a false understanding of
himself/herself, and of the education he/she is getting. “Theft,” “fraud,” and
“impersonation” are harsh words, but they accurately represent the moral status
of plagiarism and the severe prevailing attitude toward it. Students who use
another’s ideas or language without giving credit violate the most basic
agreement between students and the University; they attack the academic
enterprise at its heart. If students realize this, they will hardly plagiarize
intentionally, unless they are very cynical indeed. Unfortunately, the proper
use of other people’s work is a delicate business, and students do sometimes
plagiarize without intending to do so. Moreover, education consists almost
entirely in the proper use of other people’s ideas, so that what the University
asks you to do bears a certain resemblance to what it asks you not to do.
Inevitably, and rightly, a large part of what any student can produce comes from
books, from instructors, and from other students. Nearly as bad as plagiarism
would be a total refusal to be influenced by what other people have written or
said, i.e., to participate in the educational interchange. Thus it is necessary
that all students familiarize themselves at the outset (if they are not already
familiar) with the difference between legitimate and illegitimate borrowings.
Those who are uncertain should find the following essay helpful.
For a more complete definition and examples
of plagiarism, please see the Student Handbook at
http://www.wesleyan.edu/stduenthandbook/plagiarism.html or refer to the Faculty Handbook
policies on-line at
www.wesleyan.edu/acaf/policy/sc_plagiarism_complete.html.
|