Tuesday, April 10, 2001
Wespeak:
Meat-eaters can’t support animal rights


By Dan Shannon

Ben, please, do us all a favor and shut up. Admittedly, your Wespeak was less stupid than Adam Cayton-Holland’s, but not by much. Trust me, just as no one in the queer rights
movement is losing any sleep over Mr. Hatin’-Bawlin’s objections to their cause, I’m less than visibly upset about the fact that I’ve incurred your personal ire. But, this might be sort of
fun, so let’s go through your objections and deal with them, shall we?

Objection the First: that we had anti-McDonald’s stickers at our Procter & Gamble table. This seems like splitting hairs to me, but what the hell, let’s prove him wrong anyway. One reason
we give out McDonald’s stickers at all of our tabling events is that people like them. I can’t get them mailed to me by PETA fast enough. Give the people what they want. But they also
pertain to the issue at hand. The Procter & Gamble boycott is about Procter & Gamble on the smallest level. It’s also about animal testing as a whole, and beyond that, animal cruelty as a
whole. And McDonald’s is definitely guilty of that, along with deforestation (you’re wrong about that, boyo). 

No Ben, cows aren’t ecstatic about being included in Happy Meals. They also aren’t ecstatic about living their entire lives separated from their parents and children, prodded with
electrodes, and kept in cement cells too small for them to stand up or turn around. And finally, the reason we’re not actively boycotting animal-murdering restaurants as a whole is the
same reason we aren’t actively boycotting all companies that test on animals: it’s more efficient and easier to publicize a boycott of a particular company. But I guess if you have any
activism experience at all, you’d know that. Oh, you don’t? My mistake.

Objection the Second: that we give the unclear impression that one can’t be pro-animal-rights if one eats meat. Sorry Ben, my bad. Let me clarify. One cannot, under any circumstances,
be pro-animal-rights if one eats meat, at all, period. Is that better? I’m sick of people like you, Ben, who, when I tell them I’m vegan, say "Oh, yeah, I totally support that" as they take
bites of their hamburger. Sorry, no. Could I say "Yeah, I totally support not being racist" if I throw the words "nigger" and "spic" around left and right? That wouldn’t fly, and neither
does your argument. I’m not saying people who eat meat shouldn’t participate in the Procter & Gamble boycott or any other activities, but you should try and understand the whole
situation. Oh, and another thing. Guess what, you can’t be an environmentalist if you eat meat, either. Fifty-five square feet of the rainforest that Ben seems to care nominally about are
destroyed to produce one quarter-pounder (huh, a McDonald’s product). Think about it.

Objection the Third: God forbid anyone tell Ben Ableson that something he’s doing might be wrong. Guess what, Ben, you aren’t perfect. Neither am I. We’re both open to criticism. I
should probably recycle more, pay attention to if the clothes I buy are made at sweatshops, and swing at the first pitch less. You should probably stop eating meat. I don’t buy the
"lifestyle choice" argument. Serial killing and child molesting are both "lifestyle choices." Should I sit back and let those happen, too? Look, you have the right to do whatever the hell
stupid shit you want, as long as it doesn’t impede on another living thing’s safety. Killing and torturing animals definitely does that.

So Ben, after carefully reviewing your objections, I have a solution that I think will satisfy us both. Here’s my plan: animals certainly don’t like the idea of being murdered for food and
tortured for "science." You, however, don’t seem to think it’s such a big deal. So, I propose that you march your ass on over to Procter & Gamble corporate offices and say, "Hi, I’m here
for the product testing." And then, after they stuff your eyes full of caustic chemicals and sew them shut, you can head over to McDonald’s (you’ll be blind by this point, so I’ll show
you the way) and volunteer to get murdered, ground up, cooked, and made into a Big Mac.

No big deal, right? No need to avoid buying animal-tested products. No need to stop eating meat. As long as you’re willing to go through everything the animals that are tortured and
murdered to satisfy your consumer wants go through on a daily basis. Oh, you aren’t willing to do that? I thought you said it was no big deal? Right. I see. OK. Then shut the hell up,
quit whining, and stop wasting my time.


Shannon is a member of the class of 2001 and a member of WARN.
 
SECTIONS

> main
> news
> opinions
> features
> ampersand
> sports

Opinions Articles
Editorial:
Losing labels
Column:
skepticism is a virtue
my first car
Wespeaks:
Convocation article deeply flawed
WARN fights speciesism
Mediation offered on kiss-in debate
Argus coverage full of racist conjecture
Wespeaks wasted on personal attacks
Call for calm in Queer Studies debate
Change student dining options
Dance deserves respect
Harm Reduction
Convocation piece shows bad journalism
Convocation article: irony and analogy
Asian American Studies needed
Speakers misquoted
Argus trivializes night of empowerment
Meat-eaters can’t support animal rights
Discomfort makes you think
The loaded hyphen
Back to Top

Copyright 2001 The Wesleyan Argus. All rights reserved.
Website Questions/Comments? Email Online Editor.
Argus Questions? Email Wesleyan Argus