Friday
October 20, 2000
Opinions
articles
|
 |
 |
Editorial:
Student participation
crucial to alcohol policy
The new alcohol policy has greatly altered and stifled Wesleyan’s social
scene. Frustration and anger has been expressed in response to the newly
revised policy, which now requires students to obtain a liquor permit at
parties where alcohol is distributed. The Argus recently obtained an Aug.
18 memo that outlined Connecticut’s alcohol laws as well as the University’s
new policy (p. 14).
The memo was sent to various members of the Administration, the president
of the Wesleyan Student Assembly, and the Greek Council Presidents. However,
the rest of the student population was left guessing about the terms and
conditions of the policy. Many students are scratching their heads in confusion
about party regulations. We understand that the University has an obligation
to uphold the law, but because the policy has the greatest impact on students,
it is necessary that they are informed of changing party regulations and
can influence them as well.
Trinity College, Connecticut College, and Yale University allow students
to have on-campus parties without obtaining liquor permits, which violates
Connecticut law. We respect Wesleyan’s decision to enforce the law, even
while other schools do not. However, the aforementioned colleges also allow
students to participate in determining the school’s stance on alcohol by
including them on alcohol policy boards alongside administrators. There
is much ambiguity surrounding the University’s alcohol policy and party
regulations. We realize that we cannot change the law, but we want a say
on the manner in which the policy is interpreted and enforced.
We propose the formation of a student committee that would interact
with the Administration in setting party guidelines that would uphold Connecticut
law and, at the same time, accommodate students. A task force of students
and administrators is necessary to clarify the issues surrounding the policy,
because the best type of policy is one that is understood by both sides.
As it stands now, SJB violations have increased due to party policy violations.
This is caused in part because students are not aware of the policy’s stipulations
and subsequently violate the regulations.
A student committee addressing the University’s stance on alcohol would
facilitate communication between the Administration and students. If the
University’s goal in enforcing at tighter alcohol policy is to keep students
safe, then the Administration has a duty to work with student to keep them
informed and allow them to participate in the policy’s evolution. If the
issue is a true concern to students, then they in turn must do their part
and actively attempt to be heard by the Administration. |