PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The College of Social Studies of Wesleyan University was founded in 1959
in order to offer a coordinated, multidisciplinary program in the fields of
government, history, economics, and philosophy. The College encourages a
capacity for intellectual independence and uses a mixture of conventional grades
and special CSS grading modes to foster this in tutorials, seminars, colloquia,
and courses. Close and sustained contact between students and their tutors is an
important feature of the CSS, with the proximity of faculty offices, classrooms,
and social areas fostering significant informal academic (and nonacademic)
exchange.
The program was created in the belief that the various social studies can
best be pursued together, rather than in isolation, and that the student will
better understand the subject matter and the nature of each discipline by
considering it in its relation to the other disciplines. The intent of the CSS
is to introduce students to the basic theoretical and substantive aspects of
several disciplines, and to develop a sense of methodological criticism
supported by work in philosophy. The curriculum stresses fundamental techniques
of analysis in economics, history, and government, as well as their application
in the subject matter of those fields. Precision in writing and speaking is
stressed in essays and class work. A number of lectures and seminars provide a
sense of community that balances the educational aspect of the College.
Interested students apply for admission to the CSS during their freshman
year at Wesleyan. The College's reputation for both diversity and intensity
leads to a high degree of self-selection in the applicant pool.
The sophomore and junior programs are closely connected. The tutorials
and colloquium in the sophomore year provide an integrated account of the
emergence of modern social, political, and economic systems. The Economics
tutorial covers the history of economic theories and doctrines from the
mercantilist period to Keynes; the Government tutorial examines the emergence of
the modern nation-state, including democratic capitalist, fascist, and communist
systems; the History tutorial focuses on European history since the French
Revolution; the Colloquium in Social Theory provides an overview of the major
theories of society from Hobbes to Freud. The jun-ior philosophy colloquium
studies the different modes of inquiry in the social sciences, using texts and
examples from the sophomore tutorials. Building on these courses, the junior
tutorials examine the post-WW II era. While the specific topics covered vary
from year to year, major themes include the increasing globalization of
cultural, economic and political processes, the retreat of European colonial
empires, changing strategies of development among less developed countries, the
collapse of communism in Central and Eastern Europe, and the emergence of and
growing challenges to the welfare and regulatory state in advanced industrial
societies. The College attempts to plan the tutorials so that there will be
specific linkages between the sophomore and junior years.
In addition to a CSS seminar in the first semester, the senior year
involves a substantial piece of written work. This is often but not invariably
an Honors thesis. In all cases it is a large-scale, sustained, and serious
investigation of an intellectual problem. Constant supervision and regular
conferences with the student's tutors ensure a continuous evaluation of student
performance. At the end of each trimester in the sophomore year the tutor places
a written evaluation in each student's file, and these may provide the basis for
letters of recommendation written by tutors and Co-Chairmen. A Comprehensive
Examination given at the end of the sophomore year covers all CSS work done by
the student over that year and is conducted by the sophomore tutors. The exam
includes standard essay examination questions spread over the four fields, and a
concluding oral examination. The grading system for the sophomore examination is
explained in the box at the center of this page. Apart from the sophomore
tutorials and colloquium and these special examinations, CSS students are graded
in the same manner as other Wesleyan students, as may be seen from the
transcript.
The Sophomore Comprehensive Examinations provide a partial
evaluation of a student's overall performance after a year of intensive
tutorials in economics, government, and history as well as a colloquium in
social theory. As a partial evaluation, it does not necessarily reflect the
quality of the student's written work and class contribution in the tutorials
and colloquium, where no grades are given. These Examinations serve in large
part as an exercise allowing students to synthesize and integrate their course
work for the year, and the grades must not be construed as a complete evaluation
of the student's work in the College during the sophomore year. (For a
description of these grades see the note at the end.)
On the basis of the student's performance in tutorials, seminars, and
colloquia, the Comprehensive Examination, and other courses the tutors may make
recommendations for Phi Beta Kappa. In addition to sophomore examination grades,
tutors' letters of recommendation constitute an exceptionally significant
evaluation of the student's career in the CSS. Such letters to graduate and
professional schools and fellowship committees are based upon genuine personal
knowledge of the student and the collected tutorial and colloquium evaluations
of the student's CSS career.
_________________________________________________
Comprehensive Examination Grades
High Distinction: Signifies a truly exceptional performance in the
examination. This grade, much like the highest grade-point average in any
grading mode, is awarded only to outstanding students, students who have
demonstrated excellence across the entire range of disciplines.
Distinction: Honors grade awarded for a demonstration of high
competence in the examination.
*Commendable: Intended for students whose work is clearly and
consistently competent in the fields tested.
Satisfactory: Denotes an adequate performance.
Fail: Requires withdrawal from the College, with credit to be
determined.
* Prior to 1995 this grade was listed as "Creditable."
|