 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
SOCS
628
Civil Liberties
John Finn
| Introduction |
|
Civil Liberties is designed to introduce students to a
uniquely American, and to some ways of thinking, a wonderfully naive
contribution to politics: The written specification of individual liberties
and rights that citizens possess and can juridically enforce against the
state. Civil Liberties is not, however, a course on law. It is instead a
course in political science about law, or a course that has as its subject
the relationship of law to the most fundamental sorts of questions about
politics.
During the semester, we shall see that most of the
serious difficulties (and there are many) in the politics of civil liberties
arise from conflicts between our commitments to two or more positive
values. There are, for example, inevitable and recurrent conflicts (despite
our attempts to ignore them) between the values of liberty and equality. As
Felix Frankfurter once wrote, these and other such conflicts are "what the
Greeks thousands of years ago recognized as a tragic issue, namely the clash
of rights, not the clash of wrongs." In this course, we examine these
clashes in light of the broader philosophical and institutional problems of
the constitutional order. I hope to show that constitutional "answers" to
problems like those of abortion, freedom of speech, and affirmative action
require a coherent understanding of the Constitution, and of the assumptions
it makes about human nature and the proper ends of government and civil
society.
We will, therefore, examine the doctrinal development
of specific liberties and rights, such as due process and privacy, but we
shall consider them in a broader theoretical context. We shall want to know
what overall conception of liberties, rights, and governmental powers most
nearly reflects and promotes our best understanding of the Constitution and
the polity it both constitutes and envisions. In addressing these issues we
will confront a welter of difficult and controversial questions. It is
unlikely that we will succeed in our attempts to answer them fully or
finally. What we can hope to achieve, however, is an improved and more
sophisticated appreciation of the importance (or not) of our commitment to
civil liberties, and of the sacrifices we must make if we choose to honor
that commitment. |
|
Reading Cases in Civil Liberties |
|
Reading court cases is, for most of you, a new
experience. Unfortunately, it is not often (at least initially) a very
pleasant experience. You may find the reading a bit easier if you bear in
mind the following inquiries:
a. SUBSTANCE. What is the "law" after the
case was decided? What is the holding of the judges in the case? Is it
consistent with prior cases? How does the case fit into the "doctrine" on
this subject matter?
b. ASSUMPTIONS. What assumptions does the
opinion make to support its argument? What does it assume, for example,
about the Constitution? About human nature? About the framers? Are these
assumptions consistent with the rest of the argument? Where is the reasoning
deficient, unsupported, or implausible?
c. HISTORY. It is quite possible to see
judicial opinions as political artifacts, as "period pieces" that value
ideas quaintly idealistic or long since tarnished. Is history a relevant
source of constitutional meaning?
d. JUDICIAL ROLES. Almost every significant
case in civil liberties must come to terms with questions about the proper
role of the judiciary in a constitutional democracy. As we shall see
throughout the course, questions about relative institutional competencies
are central to a complete understanding of the constitutional order.
e. POLITICAL THEORY. Serious controversies
in civil liberties require of judges that they possess a conception of the
nature of the American political system and the importance of civil
liberties to that system. Is that conception--whether explicit or
implicit--consistent with the result in the case? Is it coherent? Is it
desirable? |
|
Books to Purchase |
|
Required:
The primary text for this course is Kommers, Finn &
Jacobsohn, American Constitutional Law: Essays, Cases, & Comparative Notes,
2d ed. (Rowman & Littlefield, 2004). Please be careful to purchase the
second edition.
In addition, please purchase or download: Hamilton et
al., The Federalist Papers. any edition
Recommended:
van Geel, Understanding Supreme Court Opinions. (2d
ed.) |
|
Schedule of Papers |
|
There are two short (4-6 pages) papers required in this
course. I will distribute the first paper topic in class on February 12. The
paper will be due in class on March 4.
I will distribute the second paper topic in class on
March 25. It will be due in class on April 15. |
|
Examinations and Grading |
|
Each short paper is worth 25% of your course grade.
There will be a final examination at a time and place
to be determined by the Registrar’s Office. The final examination is worth
30% of your course grade.
Class participation is worth 20% of your course grade. |
|
Course Schedule |
|
January 29 |
Introduction & Administravia
Assigned: The Constitution of the United States of
America
KFJ, chapters 1 & 2
Bork, "Tradition & Morality in Constitutional Law"
Brennan, "The Constitution: Contemporary Ratification" |
|
February 5 |
The Rise of Judicial Power
Assigned:
KFJ, chapter 3
Recommended:
Arkes, Beyond the Constitution
Burgess, The Contest for Authority
Snowiss, Judicial review and the Law of the
Constitution
Fisher, Constitutional Dialogues |
|
February 12 |
The Bill of Rights & Incorporation
Assigned:
KFJ, chapter 9
Recommended:
Richard Cortner, The Supreme Court and the Bill of Rights.
Charles Fairman, “Does the Fourteenth Amendment Incorporate the Bill of
Rights”? Michael Curtis, No State Shall
Abridge. |
|
February 19 |
Liberty and the Once (And Future?) Right to
Property
Assigned:
KFJ, chapter 10
Recommended:
Epstein, Takings
Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law
Ackerman, Property & the Constitution
MacPherson, "Human Rights as Property Rights"
Radin, "Property & personhood"
Siegen, Economic Liberties & the Constitution |
|
February 26 |
The Right to Privacy
Assigned:
KFJ, chapter 11
Recommended:
Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously
Grey, "Eros, Civilization, and the Burger Court"
Ely, "The Wages of Crying Wolf: Roe v. Wade"
Glendon, Abortion & Divorce in Western Law
Allen, Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women
Brill, Nobody's Business
Dworkin, Life's Dominion
Garrow, Liberty & Sexuality |
|
March 4 |
Privacy, II
Assigned:
KFJ, Chapter 11 |
|
March 25 |
Freedom of Speech, I
Assigned:
KFJ, chapter 12
Recommended:
Fish, There's No such Thing as Free Speech
Schauer, Free Speech
Bollinger, The Tolerant Society
Levy, Emergence of a Free Press
Shiffrin, The First Amendment, Democracy, and Romance
Greenawalt, Fighting Words |
|
April 1 |
Freedom of Speech, II
Assigned:
KFJ, chapter 12 (continued)
Recommended:
Meiklejohn, Free Speech & its Relation to
Self-Government
Davis, Decisions & Images |
|
April 8 |
The Religion Clauses, I
Assigned:
KFJ, chapter 13
Recommended:
Locke, Letter on Toleration
Choper, Securing Religious Liberty
Howe, The Garden & the Wilderness
Carter, The Culture of Disbelief
Levy, The Religion Clauses
Richards, Toleration & The Constitution
Smith, Foreordained Failure |
|
April 15 |
The Religion Clauses, II
Assigned:
KFJ, chapter 13 (continued) |
|
April 22 |
The Equal Protection Clause—Race
Assigned:
KFJ, chapter 14
Recommended:
Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously
Fiss, "Groups & the Equal Protection Clause"
Kluger, Simple Justice
Gunther, "In Search of an Evolving Doctrine"
Ely, "The Constitutionality of Reverse Discrimination" |
|
April 29 |
The Equal Protection Clause—Gender
Assigned:
KFJ, chapter 15
Recommended:
Baer, The Fourteenth Amendment
VanBurkleo, “Belonging to the World |
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|