![]() |
master's Essay/ master's project |
Graduate Liberal Studies Program |
|
|
|
|
Terminology
Official Draft The archival copy is defined as the completed essay or project after it has been reviewed and approved by the faculty advisor, the faculty reader, and the GLSP director, and has been printed on archival quality paper and is submitted to the GLSP office for binding. Faculty Advisor GLSP Program Advisor Faculty Reader The master's essay or project offers students the opportunity to pursue in depth a topic, issue, or project of the student's choosing, under the guidance of a faculty member. The master's essay or project provides evidence of the student's ability to independently produce, organize, and complete a graduate-level scholarly or creative work for academic credit. The master's essay or project is similar to a masters thesis in that the student is expected to synthesize the research literature, methods, and knowledge gained from courses taken in the degree or certificate program. In contrast to a masters thesis, the master's essay or project does not have to constitute an original body of new research to the field of study. The master's essay or project must, however, be original work not previously submitted for credit or a grade in the GLSP or other degree program. Student Checklist for
Master's Essay or Project
(download checklist as a Word document)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sample title page
|
Students have a maximum limit of one year (three terms) in which to submit and receive approval for their proposal following the completion of 27 units of credit (nine courses), subject to the limits of the six year completion requirement (eight years by petition). If a student's master's essay/project proposal has not been approved by the end of the third term after completion of 27 units, the student will no longer be eligible to complete the master's essay/project.
Students are expected to submit the final archival copy of the essay/project within four terms after completion of 27 units. The four term time period begins with the term immediately after the student has completed all coursework (excluding the master's essay or project course) required for the 30-unit plan of study.
Students have a maximum limit of three years (nine terms) in which to complete the master's essay or project following the completion of 27 units of credit (nine courses), subject to the limits of the six year completion requirement (eight years by petition).
Ideal Timeline for the Master's Essay/Project
| During coursework | ||
|
||
| Developing the proposal (one term) | ||
|
||
| The essay/project (one - two terms) | ||
|
||
| Review process (one term) | ||
|
||
Registration during the Proposal and Essay/Project Work
Beginning with the term immediately following completion of 27 units, students will be automatically enrolled in Research Status and billed the registration fee every term. Research Status ensures that you will not experience a lapse in your student privileges, including Wesleyan email and electronic portfolio services, borrowing and research database privileges through the Wesleyan/Trinity/ Connecticut College library consortium, and access to Wesleyan's athletic facilities. Your proposal and Approval form must be submitted to the GLSP office on the Monday three full weeks prior to the first Monday of the term in order to be eligible to become enrolled in the essay/project course for that term. The proposal must be officially approved by the Friday of the first week of classes in order to register during that term. If revisions are required prior to approval, you will not be able to officially register for the essay project course until the following term. The tuition will be billed to your student account once the proposal is approved.Each term students will will be registered for one of the following:
|
|||
| Tuition: | $3,240 | ||
| Registration Fee: | $100 | ||
|
|||
| Tuition: | $0 | ||
| Registration Fee: | $100 | ||
The Proposal: Structure
The proposal is the
foundation from which the master's essay or project is developed. Students
should view the proposal not as just a description of what they intend to
accomplish in the master's work, but as the first step in the development of the
work. The proposal should be a detailed document that incorporates research,
coursework, and time frames for completion. Students should utilize the
appropriate publication manual for the chosen topic (see
below) and format the proposal in accordance with the guidelines described
at the end of this document. In addition to serving as a guide to the student
throughout the development of the master's essay or project, a thoroughly
developed proposal also demonstrates to the GLSP director that the student has a
clear vision and plan for accomplishing his/her goals.
Requirements
Title page (1 page)
The title page must include a working title, formatted exactly as the sample in the essay guidelines.
Proposal (5 7 pages)
1. Abstract (1 paragraph)
In one paragraph, state the central question, theme, or problem your essay or project will address. Do not use generalizationsyou should state your issue in the form of a developed thesis statement.
2. Development of topic
Provide a detailed description of the topic and the academic context (i.e., the problems or issues in the field that the essay/project will address). This discussion may include a description of a hypothesis, anticipated results, process, product, artistic direction planned, or expected findings
3. Methodology
Address the academic disciplines from which you will draw and explain which of these disciplines will inform the methodology you use. Provide a detailed description of the methods of inquiry and analysis.
4. Literature review: analysis of scholarly context
Review the available literature on the topic: what is already known about the topic? What is not known? How does this information relate to the proposed work?
5. Anticipated findings
Provide a description of what you expect to find as the result of your research.
Appendices
1. Timetable
Document the key milestones required to complete the master's essay or project in the specified timeframe and provide description of how the student will interact with the faculty advisor: schedule of meetings, timeframe for response and feedback, key dates to deliver information for review, review for publication style compliance, etc.
2. Wesleyan resources
Describe the faculty and library resources available at Wesleyan that will support your project.
3. Bibliography (4 7 pages)
Preliminary list of the source materials to be used (libraries, readings, references, labs, field area, etc.), documented using one of the publication styles (i.e., APA, MLA, Chicago, or Turabian
4. Essay/Project Approval Form signed by advisor, reader, and student, submitted for approval by GLSP director
5. All documents required for IRB approval (required only if student plans to use human subjects as data)
The Proposal: Choosing a
Topic
Students will work with their chosen topic for approximately two to three terms
and it is therefore most important that students choose topics of compelling,
sustainable interest.
Requirements
Where to begin
The best place to begin searching for
topic ideas is in the student's former coursework. Students should think back
through their GLSP courses for ideas and topics that can be developed into a
graduate level master's essay or project. The most successful master's essays
and projects usually arise from ideas developed in previous coursework.
Choosing a topic in which you have already done some research will make the
essay or project much more manageable because you already have a base of
knowledge and research from which to draw.
Students may also choose to consult with faculty members about ideas, and are welcome to examine previous master's essays/projects in the Olin Library archives (in closed stacks; advance notice required).
Many liberal arts topics, in the students' concentration area, may be chosen for the master's essay or project. However, professional projects such as lesson plans, instruction manuals, or purely technical descriptions are not consistent with the GLSP curriculum and will not be approved for the essay or project. Areas of inquiry not taught at Wesleyan may not be approved
The Proposal: Choosing a Faculty Advisor and Faculty Reader
The master's essay or project must be completed under the guidance of a faculty advisor with expertise in the students chosen topic. The faculty advisor serves as the academic subject and discipline-specific style expert, reviewing and approving all work prior to submission to the GLSP office.
Requirements
Where to begin
The best place to begin is with your previous GLSP instructors. Choosing a faculty advisor with whom you have previously studied is strongly encouraged because the faculty member is already familiar with your academic work and you are already familiar with the faculty members expectations and critical methods.
If it is not possible to work with a previous GLSP instructor, you will need to find a faculty member or recent GLSP instructor who has expertise in the area of your master's essay or project.
Choosing a Faculty Reader
Once you have selected a faculty advisor, you should consult with your advisor and the GLSP to determine an appropriate faculty reader. The reader will review your official draft after it has been approved by your advisor. The role of the faculty reader is to review the work to provide additional expertise and affirm that the work addresses its academic subject successfully. The reader may be familiar with research on the subject that the student is unaware of, and may suggest that the student address that research or related issues.
The Proposal Process
Students are encouraged to schedule a
meeting with Sheryl Culotta, Associate Director for Academic Services, to
discuss possible topic(s) and develop a list of potential advisors. Sheryl can
be reached at 860-685-3008 or by
email.
After doing some initial research on your proposed topic, you should prepare a one two paragraph abstract, preliminary bibliography, and brief outline before approaching a possible advisor. These will help you to convince the faculty member of the value of your project as well as your ability to achieve your goals. You should also be prepared to discuss a tentative schedule for completing the master's essay or project with the faculty advisor. At this initial meeting it is advisable to confirm that the faculty member will be able to serve as faculty advisor throughout the entire process from development of the proposal through submission of the final approved essay. This timeframe is typically two to three terms (10 - 12 months), and both the student and faculty member should be prepared for this commitment.
Once a faculty member has agreed to serve as your advisor, discuss your anticipated graduation date and agree on a timetable for meetings and submission of drafts. It is your responsibility to keep your advisor apprised of your progress. In most cases, students and advisors need to meet three five times: initially, to finalize a topic, then to review drafts. Keep in mind that your advisor must have enough time to read and evaluate your work before returning it to you with comments, and that you will need time to incorporate those comments. You should also be prepared for the possibility that your advisor will request substantial changes to every draft, including your proposed final version.
Once you have refined your topic and timeline and your advisor has approved it, complete and submit to the GLSP office the Proposal Approval Form with your official proposal.
Proposal Submission and Review
Each proposal is reviewed twice: first by your
advisor, then by the GLSP director. When you believe your proposal is ready,
submit it to your advisor along with the Essay and Project Approval Form for his
or her review and approval. Once your advisor has signed the Approval Form,
submit the Approval form together with your proposal and Essay/Project
Registration form to the GLSP office. A confirmation letter stating that we are
in receipt of your proposal will be sent to you within 1-2 business after
receipt of your proposal. The student should allow at least 2-3 weeks
(excluding holidays) for review and comments or review and approval by the GLSP
director.
Revisions and Approval
Once the GLSP director has reviewed your
proposal, you will receive a letter in the mail stating (1) that the proposal
has been approved as is, (2) that it will be approved with the following
revisions, or (3) that that the director would like you to make the following
revisions and re-submit the proposal. In the letter, the GLSP director will
comment on the concept, content/clarity, and formatting of the proposal. In
many cases, the GLSP director will ask for revisions to the proposal prior to
approval. Students should factor this possibility into their timeline.
Use of Human Research Subjects
If your topic involves the use of human subjects (i.e., if you will interview people, etc.), you will need to get approval from Wesleyan's Institutional Review Board (IRB). The need for IRBapproval extends to any manner of research, includingexperiments, interviews, surveys, and other data collectingmethods. This process is designed to protect the rightsand welfare of human participants by ensuring that theyare selected equitably, participating voluntarily, fully informed of the risks and benefits of the research, and that the research minimizes risks to humans and protects their privacy and confidentiality. Most proposals will be granted an expedited IRB review. However, if the proposed research presents particular concerns, it will be subject to a full board review. If you suspect that your proposal may require a full board review, you may contact Philippa Coughlan, Director, Office of Behavioral Health for Students, Adjunct Professor of Psychology at 860-685-3144 to informally discuss the matter. The full process for submitting all projects to the IRB can be found here. Your proposal to the GLSP should include all of the information you intend to submit to the IRB. After your proposal has been approved by the GLSP, you will submit the proposal to the IRB. The IRB must review and approve ongoing projects at least once a year and all projects involving human subjects whenever changes occur in the research design. The IRB must be notified of any unanticipated problem involving risks to subjects or others, including physical or psychological injury to subjects, improper disclosure of private information, economic loss, or other potentially harmful occurrences.Student-Advisor Relationship and Responsibilities
The student and faculty advisor will work together from the development of the initial proposal through to the completion of the final revisions. It is important for both the student and the advisor to understand their responsibilities to ensure that the student-advisor relationship is successful.
The faculty advisor should:The Master's Essay or master's Project
The Master's Essay
The master's essay provides an opportunity for in-depth focus on a particular subject in the liberal arts. The essay should be between 60 and 100 pages in length to allow the student to fully introduce and develop the topic, incorporate the relevant literature (as applicable), and summarize the conclusions. The essay must be completed under the supervision of a qualified faculty advisor.
The Master's Project
The master's project may take many forms including: creative writing; performance; theatre, film, or video production; experimentation/investigation; or artistic exhibition. It may be an original body of art, a creative performance, a mathematical project, or a laboratory science study.
The master's project in the area of writing could include a collection of poems, short stories, a short novel, a screenplay, or other creative writing. Another possibility is an investigative work based upon empirical studies in a laboratory or in the field. Written original creative projects (i.e., short stories, poetry, etc.) although similar in length to the master's essay (between 60 and 100 pages) must still be accompanied by an analytic paper, at least 20 pages in length.
No matter what form the project takes, students completing a final project must also complete an accompanying analytic paper of at least 20 pages. The accompanying analytic paper describes and evaluates the students experience of developing the project, and incorporates coursework, literature, and research that are applicable and relevant to the creative work.
Project Documentation
Students who complete master's projects must submit
videotapes, photographs, slides, charts, and/or other appropriate forms of
documentation such as programs or gallery lists. Field projects might include a
research-style manuscript and/or videos, photographs, charts, computer files, or
other appropriate forms of documentation. The faculty advisor must view the
performance or studio work, preferably in person. Whenever possible, the GLSP
director or designee should also attend a show or performance.
Completing the Master's Essay or Project
Submission of the Official DraftComments from the Faculty Reader
The readers charge is to evaluate the work to determine
that the stated goals of the proposal have been met, that the student has
demonstrated mastery of the subject matter, has incorporated the literature and
research in the area, and that the work has been written clearly. Creative
projects are also evaluated on the artistry of photos, drawings, paintings,
performances, or writing. The readers comments will include one of the
following determinations:
Excellent As Is
If the reader indicates that the official draft is
excellent as is, the work should be checked for typos and minor grammatical
errors and to ensure that all formatting is in accordance with the style manual
and the guidelines in this document. Once the faculty advisor has granted
approval the student should submit the Revised Official Draft to the GLSP office
for final review by the GLSP director.
Acceptable with Minor Revisions
If the reader indicates that the official draft is
acceptable after minor revisions, the student must consult with the
faculty advisor to determine a plan for incorporating the readers comments.
The student and the faculty advisor must determine which of the readers
comments contribute to the original goal of the work as outlined in the
proposal, and which comments do not support this goal. A response must be
drafted by the student following the revision of the work that must outline how
the readers comments were incorporated and offer a rationale for the exclusion
of particular suggestions.
The work should then be checked for typos and minor grammatical errors and to ensure that all formatting is in accordance with the style manual and the guidelines in this document. Once the faculty advisor has granted approval the student should submit the Revised Official Draft along with the written response to the readers comments, to the GLSP office for final review by the GLSP director.
Revisions to Academic Analysis and/or Argument Recommended
If the reader indicates that "revisions to academic
analysis and/or argument recommended," the student must consult with the faculty advisor to decide on
a plan for addressing the comments. The student and the faculty advisor must
determine which of the reader's comments contribute to the original goal of the
work as outlined in the proposal, and which comments do not support this goal.
A response must be drafted by the student following the revision of the work
that must outline how the readers comments were incorporated and offer a
rationale for not incorporating particular suggestions.
Once the faculty advisor has granted approval the student should submit the Revised Official Draft along with the written response to the readers comments, to the GLSP office for final review by the GLSP director.
Submission of the Revised Official Draft
Once the comments from the reader have been incorporated
into the essay or project and the advisor has approved the work, the student
must submit the Revised Official Draft, formatted in accordance with the
guidelines at the end of this document, together with the response to reader
comments, to the GLSP office for review by the GLSP director.
The GLSP director will review the essay or project and return it to the student along with a letter detailing any changes that need to be made prior to approval, or notifying the student that the essay or project has officially been approved. Students should allow at least five business days to receive final approval from the Director.
Grading
Once the faculty reader, the faculty advisor, and the GLSP
director have approved the essay or project, a grade request form is sent to the
faculty advisor, by the GLSP office. The comments from the faculty reader and
director (if applicable) should be taken into consideration when issuing a
grade, although the faculty advisor has the final decision on the grade assigned
to the work. All grades for master's essays or projects must be submitted on the GLSP Approval of Essay/Project Form, which is sent to the faculty advisor by the
GLSP director.
Submission Requirements
Paper:
Completion
Once the essay or project is approved and graded providing all other degree or certificate requirements have been met three units of credit will be awarded, the students program is considered completed, and the student earns the rights and carries the responsibilities of the degree or certificate. Please note that students graduate and diplomas are issued only during the annual spring commencement, held in late May. For letters of completion, students must submit a written request to the Assistant Director for Student Services, allowing 2-4 weeks for requests to be processed. For an official transcript, students should contact the Office of the Wesleyan University Registrar, (860) 685-2810.
Formatting Guidelines
All proposals, essays, projects, or accompanying project
narratives must be prepared according to the following formatting guidelines:
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American psychological association (5th ed.). New York, NY: American Psychological Association.
Gibaldi, J. (1998). MLA style manual and guide to scholarly publishing. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Modern Language Associate of America.Turabian, K. L. (1996). A manual for writers of term papers, term papers, theses, and dissertations. (6th ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Protecting Intellectual PropertyCopyright 2003 Jane E. Smith
Academic Prizes
Faculty can nominate GLSP students for the following academic prizes to be awarded at commencement:
Honor System
Upon registration for courses at Wesleyan University, all
graduate and undergraduate students acknowledge acceptance of certain enduring
and quite specific standards of academic conduct known as the Honor System (view
or download the
GLSP
Student Handbook).
Under this system, the students written exercises and assignments in or out of
the classroom may be conducted without faculty surveillance, with each student
neither using nor giving unauthorized aid during the exercise. When writing
course papers, essays, and project summaries, students agree they will not use,
without proper acknowledgment, the wording of any sentence, part of a sentence,
or the work of another author without citing the source of the information. In
conforming to the Honor System, students reflect in their work the standards of
intellectual honesty that are the foundation of education and scholarship. The
GLSP expects all students to meet these standards.