SOCS 611
An Age of Danger? International Security in the Post-September 11 World
Douglas Foyle
Course Description | |
Are you safer today than you have ever been? The post-Cold War and post-September 11 eras have seen the end of some threats to international security and the rise of others. Although the central threat of global nuclear war that infused the Cold War has receded, it has been replaced with a myriad of threats that appear to belie easy solutions. This course considers alternative ways to conceive of "international security" and how differences in these perspectives can affect our response to international threats. The course focuses on the relationship between force and international security, the prospects for peace and conflict in specific regions of the world, and some of the new vexing issues such as terrorism, nuclear proliferation, nationalism and ethnic conflict, environmental issues, disease, and migration among other issues. Since this is an intensive course, students are expected to have completed the two short papers as well as all the reading before the class has begun. It is suggested that students take brief notes or outline the readings as they go along to ease in their review before the material is dealt with in the class. |
|
Course Grading | |
Grades will be based on two short papers (20% each), an essay final (40%), and participation (20%). Class periods will be devoted to a mixture of lecture and discussion. Students must come to class prepared to discuss the assigned reading. |
|
Short Papers | |
The short papers should be 4-5 pages in length. Students are required to write one paper for two of the course sessions (two papers in total). The paper topic can address any one of the discussion questions listed in the class schedule below (questions are listed after the reading). Please note the question you are addressing at the top of your paper. There are four Roman numeral sections for the course. Papers must be written on questions from different sections (e.g., one paper from Section I and one from Section II; one from II and one from IV; etc.). Please contact me if you have a question regarding this requirement. Papers should be submitted on the first day of class (August 10). Papers should be typed, double-spaced, single-sided, 12 point font, 1 inch margins, and stabled together (if submitted in paper form). All pages should be numbered. Comments and grades will be provided through the Blackboard. References to material assigned for the course can be of the form: (Author Name, page number). Any references to material not assigned for the course should conform to the style outlined in: Kate L. Turabian, A Manual For Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations, 6th ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996). |
|
Final | |
Take-Home Essay Final: A take-home essay final will be due on Friday, August 21 at 10 p.m. The essay should be e-mailed to me as an attachment. Comments and grades will be provided through the Blackboard. The page limit is 6-8 pages. The question is: Given what you have learned in this course, do you think the world is likely to be a more or less secure place in the future? Why or why not? Be sure to formulate your answer in reference to the concepts and material from the course. |
|
Participation | |
Participation will be evaluated based upon the student's contribution to discussion, responsiveness to other students, and quality of insight. If a student has more than one excused absence from class, the student has the option of completing extra work to make up for the missed participation. The make-up work is a 1 page reaction paper to one of the readings for that section Essentially, pick one of the readings from the day missed and give your view on why the article is useful, not useful, etc. (e.g., "Professor Murray completely misses the point that..."). |
|
Readings | |
The following book is required reading and is available for purchase at Broad Street Books: Dan Caldwell and Robert E. Williams, Jr. Seeking Security in an Insecure World It is on reserve at Olin Library. All the other readings are available directly from the course Blackboard as indicated on the syllabus. |
|
Course Schedule | |
August 10 |
I. Introduction: How to View International Security **Morning Session 1: How Do You Spell "Security"? Differing Visions 1. What makes an issue an "international security issue"? Why? **Morning Session 2: Why We Can't All Get Along: The Security Dilemma 1. How is the human security view distinct from the other perspectives (international security in Jervis and national security in Trager) in terms of its assumptions about the nature of security issues? **Lunch II. Traditional Approaches: "National Security" and "International Security" **Afternoon Session 1: War: What is it Good for? Caldwell & Williams, pp. 17-33 1. Is war the continuation of politics by other means (as Clausewitz suggests)? Do you agree or disagree with his view? Why or why not? **Afternoon Session 2: Making an Offer They Can't Refuse: The Use of Force Thomas C. Schelling, "The Diplomacy of Violence," Arms and Influence, pp. 1-34. (Blackboard) |
August 11 |
**Morning Session 1: Thinking the Unthinkable: Nuclear Diplomacy Caldwell & Williams, pp. 34-46 1. The Jervis, Mueller, and Cohn were all written during the Cold War. Do their core insights still apply in today's world? Why or why not? **Morning Session 2: Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf? American Hegemony Barry Posen, "Command of the Commons," International Security Summer 2003 (Blackboard) 1. What effect does American power have on the international system? Why? **Lunch III. Regional Security **Afternoon Session 1: Where in the World is Matt Lauer Today?: Regional Security as a Concept Diehl, Lepgold , Diehl, Regional Conflict Management, pp. 1-80 (Blackboard) 1. How is regional security view similar or different than national security view? **Afternoon Session 2: Asia Evelyn Goh, "Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies," International Security, Winter 2007/2008 (Blackboard) 1. How would you describe the nature of security problem in this region? |
August 12 |
**Morning Session 1 Middle East Niall Ferguson, The Next War of the World," Foreign Affairs September/October 2006 (Blackboard) 1. How would you describe the nature of security problem in this region? **Morning Session 2 Latin America Peter Hakim, "Is Washington Losing Latin America?" Foreign Affairs, January/February 2006. (Blackboard) 1. How would you describe the nature of security problem in this region? **Lunch **Afternoon Session 1: Africa Boaz Atzili, "When Good Fences Make Bad Neighbors: Fixed Borders, State Weakness, and International Conflict" International Security Winter 2006/2007 (Blackboard) 1. How would you describe the nature of security problem in this region? **Afternoon Session 2: Europe and Regional Security Conclusions Diehl, Regional Conflict Management, pp. 269-282 (Blackboard) 1. How would you describe the nature of security problem in this region? |
August 13 |
IV. Alternative Approaches: Global Security and Human Security **Morning Session 1: The Day After Tomorrow: The Environment Caldwell & Williams, pp. 154-169 1. Homer-Dixon says the violence is "subnational, persistent, and diffuse" (p. 6). If true, is the environment an international security issue? **Morning Session 2: Flowing Like a River: Migration and Water (and Oil) Fiona B. Adamson, "Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security," International Security Summer 2006 (Blackboard) 1. Should migration based issues be seen as an international security issue or just problems of human suffering in the world? Why? **Lunch **Afternoon Session 1: Are You Talking to Me?: Ethnic and National Conflict Caldwell & Williams, pp. 117-143 1. Are internal conflicts a problem for international security? Why or why not? **Afternoon Session 2: Everybody's Doing It: Nuclear Proliferation Caldwell & Williams, pp. 61-72 1. What assumptions do Waltz and Sagan make about the way leaders make decisions? What affect does this have on the policies they recommend? |
August 14 |
**Morning Session 1: Should You Believe the Hype? Terrorism Caldwell & Williams, pp. 170-181 1. How much of a threat is terrorism relative to other threats (nuclear, ethnic conflict, disease, nuclear proliferation)? Why? **Morning Session 2: The Reigning and Undisputed Champion: Disease (and Biological Weapons) Caldwell & Williams, pp. 47-60, 75-88 1. A scholar once observed that "infectious diseases are potentially the largest threat to human security." Do you agree or disagree with this view? Why? **Lunch **Afternoon Session 1: Lions, and Tigers, and Bears: Cyberthreats, Drugs, Gender, and a Geriatric Peace. Oh My! Caldwell & Williams, pp. 89-114 1. If world were run by women, would it be more peaceful? Why or why not? **Afternoon Session 2: What? Me Worry?: Conclusions - A More or Less Secure Future? Caldwell & Williams, pp. 182-194 |