
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Richard Slotkin, Olin Professor of English, professor of American Studies,
studied the 369th Battalion’s and 77th Division’s roles in France for his
latest book, “Lost Battalions: The Great War and the Crisis of American
Nationality." |
|
| Posted 12.19.05 |
Professor Studies How Black, Immigrant Outcasts Become WWI Heroes, but
still Return as Outcasts
|
In 1918, the United States loaned its all-black
369th Infantry Regiment to fight under the French flag in World War I. These
soldiers, rejected for combat duty by their own country because they were
black, fought for 191 days, longer than any other American unit in the war.
The ‘Harlem Hell Fighters,’ received an honorable award for bravery from the
French. In their heroic attack on Sechault, of some 2,500 riflemen who began
the battle only 700 survived unhurt.
“They kept fighting until they couldn’t fight anymore,” Slotkin says. “Their
efforts were extraordinary. Studies of combat psychology show that no person
can handle more than 180 days in combat, and they fought for more than 190
days.”
Twenty miles away, 700 New York immigrants forming a battalion of the United
States’ 77th Division, or 'Melting Pot Division' crossed German lines and
advanced into France's Argonne Forest. This unit of Jewish, Italian and
other eastern Europeans battled for six days with limited ammunition and
supplies, food, water and shelter. They refused to surrender, although their
unit was completely surrounded. Only 200 survived.
Richard Slotkin, Olin Professor of English, professor of American Studies,
has spent the past four years extensively researching the 369th Battalion’s
and 77th Division’s roles in France. His latest book, “Lost Battalions: The
Great War and the Crisis of American Nationality,” published in December
2005 by Henry Holt and Co., depicts American black and immigrant soldiers
who were considered to be lesser citizens and racially inferior during and
after the war.
In 1917, one in three people living in America was from a foreign country or
had a foreign-born parent. Although the U.S. government would have preferred
to send only white, American-born citizens to combat, immigrants were
promised equality in return for their loyal service in the war.
“During World War I, we had to raise an army of 2 million men overnight, and
we could not play this role without having minorities involved in the war,”
Slotkin explains. “The government basically told these Blacks and immigrants
that ‘if you go to war, we will accept you.’ The U.S. had to look at how all
men are created equal in a way that never existed before.”
“Some of these guys were from Germany or Austria and could have taken an
exemption from being in the war, but they wanted to show their American
patriotism,” Slotkin explains. “But when they came back to the U.S., they
still got the shaft.” Congress identified them as “races” incapable of full
Americanization, banned further immigration and signalled acceptance of
ethnic discrimination.
The U.S. also broke its promise to the Blacks.
The Army gave the French a “Secret Information Concerning Black American
Troops,” which demanded the adoption of strict racial separation. The
document stated that it was essential that Frenchmen understand that to
Americans, displays of interracial friendship were deeply offensive. It
declared that friendships would encourage “intolerable pretensions to
equality, which would pose a danger to America’s civil peace when the troops
came home.”
Slotkin studied World War I unit histories written in books and published on
microfilm. He visited the National Archives to study World War I military
books, and hired research assistants, one of which translated Yiddish
newspaper clippings for the project.
He focused his research on the lives of about two dozen characters,
including the Lost Battalion’s captain Charles Whittlesey, who was named a
recipient of the Medal of Honor, the highest award given by the U.S. Army
following the war. Whittlesey is also the main character in the Arts and
Entertainment movie titled “Lost Battalion” from 2001. Slotkin says the
movie portrays an accurate depiction of the events that occurred between
Oct. 2-8, 1918.
The author says history buffs and scholars would be interested in his
research, although the story is written in a way that can appeal to the
general public. The History Book Club and Military Book Club have both
accepted Slotkin’s book into their listings.
A recent Publishers Weekly Starred Review states that Slotkin’s story
“examines the relationship between war and citizenship in this trenchant,
gracefully written military and social history. … Slotkin smoothly
telescopes from the trenches to the political and social implications for
decades to come in this insightful, valuable account.”
“Stories like these haven’t been taught in schools because Americans don’t
like to look at how hard it has been to become a multicultural nation,”
Slotkin says.
Slotkin is the author of seven other books including “Abe: A Novel of the
Young Lincoln,” “Gunfighter Nation” and “Regeneration Through Violence.” He
is a National Book Award Finalist and winner of the Albert J. Beveridge
Prize. |
| |
| By
Olivia Bartlett, Wesleyan Connection editor |

|
 |
 |
|
 |