| COL 289 Pornography
The following is the course description for COL
(college of letters) 289, a course studying pornography at Wesleyan University:
"This course investigates pornographic
literature as a body of discursive practices whose 'materials,' according to the cultural
critic Susan Sontag, comprise 'one of the extreme forms of human consciousness.' The
pornography we study is an art of transgression which impels human sexuality toward,
against, and beyond the limits which have traditionally defined civil discourses and
practices-- defined, that is, by regimes of dominance and submission, inclusion or
exclusion, in the domains of organ and emotional pleasure. Our examination accordingly
includes the implication of pornography in so-called perverse practices such as voyeurism,
bestiality, sadism, and masochism, and considers the inflections of the dominant
white-heterosexual tradition by alternative sexualities and genders, as well as by race,
class, age, mental and physical competence. We also attempt to identify the factors,
intrinsic and extrinsic, which align the pornographic impulse with revolutionary or
conservative political practices. But our primary focus is on pornography as radical
representations of sexuality whose themes are violation, degradation, and exposure."
|


Over the Top at Wesleyan
EDITORIAL |
| Tuesday, May 11 |
|
 |
Call us old fashioned, but Wesleyan University's seminar course on
pornography comes as a shock. Even for that bastion of liberal and libertine
tought in Middletown, the course described in part as an examination of the
"implication of pornography in so-called perverse practices such as
voyeurism, bestiality, sadism and masochism . . . " is over the top.
In this line of scholarly pursuit, students earn credit by turning
in homemade films of other studentss engaging in such acts as masturbation.
Once upon a time, frat boys locked the doors and pulled down the shades to
show stag films. Now they're part of the curriculum. And parents pay more
than $30,000 a year for the privilege of haing their children appear in such
trash?
Wesleyan is a private institution that is free to develop its own
curricula. But people in the broader community who are offended at the
academic license--as opposed to academic freedom--are also constitutionally
endowed to voice their objections.
Pornography can be a legitimate subject of inquiry and research. But
Wesleyan's course smacks of voyeurism and exploitation.
Predictably, the academic club has circled the wagons around
Professor Hope Weissman, who tells her students, "Just create your own work
of pornography" for the final course assignment, and who says she has "no
aplogies." "Very brave," says a California colleague of Ms. Weissman. Brave
is not the right word for it.
Porn studies "are very chic right now," says a Wesleyan student. May
the winds of academic change quickly rid the university of this fad before
lasting damage is done to its reputation.
The course is "definitely symbolic of the kind of place Wesleyan
is," said another student. We'll bet that President Douglas Bennet doesn't
put that quote in his next fund-raising letter. |
|