Code of Non-Academic Conduct Case Summaries 2025-2026
2025-2026 CODE OF NON-ACADEMIC CONDUCT (CNAC) - CASE SUMMARIES
Regulation 1- Disturbance of the Peace
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that students A, B, C, D, and E violated Wesleyan University’s Code of Non Academic Conduct, Regulations 1 and 15. The board found the students responsible for violating Regulations 1 and 15 and recommended that Students A, B, C, D, and E be sanctioned with a disciplinary warning and other educational sanctions.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Student A violated Regulation 1, Regulation 13B and Regulation 14 and 15 of Wesleyan University's Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found the student responsible for violating the University's smoking policy and not responsible for any other alleged violations and recommends Student A to be sanctioned with a Disciplinary Warning.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Student C and D violated Regulation 1, 13b, 14 and 15 of Wesleyan University’s Code of Non-Academic Conduct. After careful deliberation, the board found more likely than not that the students were not responsible.
Regulation2 – Harassment and Abuse
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Student A violated Regulation 2 of the Wesleyan University’s Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found Student A responsible of the alleged violation and issued a disciplinary warning.
Regulation 3 – Sexual Misconduct/Sexual Assault
Regulation 4 - Property
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Students A, B, C and D violated Regulations 4 and 14 of the Wesleyan University’s Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found all students responsible for Regulation 4, but Students A and B responsible for Regulation 14, and Students C and D not responsible for Regulation 14. The board recommends disciplinary warnings for all involved students.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Student A violated Regulations 4, 13, 13A, 10, and 15 of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct.
The board found Student A not responsible for violating Regulation 13A. The board found Student A responsible for violating Regulations 4, 13, 10, and 15 and recommended that they be sanctioned with a suspension for the Fall 2026 term and must pay back DKK $17,900 owed to DIS for damages, movers, emergency response, and extra costs for impacted students.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that a student violated Regulations 4, 13a, 13b, 15 (smoking), 15 (Quiet Hours) of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found the student not responsible for Regulation 15 smoking, but responsible for Regulation 4, 13a, 13b and 15 (Quiet Hours). The student was placed on disciplinary probation.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Students A & B violated Regulations 4, 13(b), 13(c), 13(i), & 15 of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found students A & B responsible for violating Regulations 4,13(c) & 15, but not responsible for Regulation 13b or 13i and sanctioned the students with a disciplinary warning.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Student A violated Regulation 4 of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. Student A did not appear, so the board utilized the written testimony and found student A responsible for violating regulation 4. The board recommended Student A to be sanctioned with a disciplinary warning.
In a Simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Students A, B, C, D, E, and F violated Regulation 4 of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found all students responsible for violating Regulation 4 and recommended all students be sanctioned with a Disciplinary Warning.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that a student violated Regulations 4, 9b, and 15 (Smoking) of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found the student responsible for violating regulation 4, 9b, and not responsible for Regulation 15 (Smoking) and recommended this student to be sanctioned with a Disciplinary Warning.
Regulation 5 – False Information
Regulation 6 – Misuse of Documents
Regulation 7 – Tampering with Locks and Duplication of Keys
Regulation 8 – Fire Protection Systems
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that a student had violated Regulations 8 and 9b of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found the student responsible for violating both of these regulations, and recommended this student to be sanctioned with a Disciplinary Warning.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that student A violated Regulation 8 and Regulation 13A of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found Student A responsible for both violations and issued a disciplinary warning and additionally recommended that the student should have open communication with their housemates.
Regulation 9 – Restricted Items/Fire Hazards
9a-Starting a Fire
In a full hearing, the board considered allegations that students A and B violated regulations 9a and 15 of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found Students A and B responsible for regulation 9a but not responsible for regulation 15 and recommended a disciplinary warning as sanctions.
9b-Storing Flammable Material
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that students A, B, C and D violated regulations 9b, 9d, and 13a of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. Students A and B pled responsible to all violations, and students C and D pled responsible to all but 13A. The board found the students responsible in a manner commensurate with their pleas, as they lined up with available documentation. The board recommends disciplinary warning for all students.
In a Simplified Hearing, the board considered allegations that Student A violated Regulations 9b and 13b of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found the student responsible for both violations due to the photographic evidence, and recommended the student be sanctioned with a Disciplinary Warning.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Student A violated Section II, Regulations 9D and 13A of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found student A responsible for violating regulations 9D and 13A, so the board recommended Student A to be sanctioned with a disciplinary warning and other educational sanctions.
In a Simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Students A, B, C, D, and E violated Section II, Regulation 9(B), 13(A), 15 & 9(D) of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found Student A not responsible for violations 9(B) & 13(A), and responsible for 15 & 9(D). The board found Student B not responsible for violations 9(B) & 13(A), and responsible for 15 & 9(D). The board found student C not responsible for 13(A) and responsible for 9(B), 15, & 9(D). The board found student D not responsible for 9(B) and responsible for 13(A), 15, & 9(D). The board found student E not responsible for 9(B) & 13(A), and responsible for 15 & 9(D). We recommend that all students be sanctioned with a Disciplinary Warning.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Student A violated Section II, Regulation 9D of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found student A responsible for violating regulation 9D and recommended Student A to be sanctioned with a disciplinary warning and other educational sanctions.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Students A,B,C,D,E violated Section II, Regulations 9B and 9D of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found students A, B, C, D responsible for violating regulation 9D and Student E responsible for violating regulations 9B and 9D and recommended all be sanctioned with a disciplinary warning and other educational sanctions.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Student A violated Section II, Regulation 9d, 13a, smoking of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found the student responsible for violating Regulation 9d and 13a and recommended student A to be sanctioned with a disciplinary warning. Student took responsibility and was sincere about their mistakes.
In a simplified hearing, the board reviewed documentation and heard testimony from 1 student alleged to have violated Section II, Regulation 9b of the Code of Non-Academic Conduct. Student plead responsible for this violation. After deliberation, the board found the student responsible for violating this regulation, and recommended this student to be sanctioned with a Disciplinary Warning.
Regulation 10 – Reckless Endangerment
In a Simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Student B violated Section II, Regulation 10, Reckless Endangerment of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found the student responsible and recommended a Disciplinary Warning.
In a simplified hearing, the board heard testimony and reviewed documentation for 5 students alleged to have all violated regulations 10 and 15 of the CNAC. Students A-C claimed responsibility for violating regulation 15, but were not responsible for violating regulation 10. Students D and E were not present on campus during the alleged violations. The board found students A-C responsible and recommended a Disciplinary Warning.
Regulation 11 - Pets
Regulation 12 - Disruptions
Regulation 13 – Drugs and Alcohol
Regulation 13a – Possession, use, manufacture, distribution or dispensing of illegal drugs or controlled substances
In a simplified hearing the board heard testimony and reviewed documentation regarding an alleged violation of regulation 13A. The student pled responsible and was remorseful. After deliberation, the board found the student responsible for the alleged violation. The board gave the student a disciplinary warning
Regulation 13b – Underage possession or consumption of alcohol
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Student A violated Section II, Regulations 13b and 15 of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found the student responsible for violating Regulation 13b due to the multiple empty beer bottles in their room. The board also found the student responsible for violating Regulation 15 due to the admission of burning incense in their room. The board recommended that Student A be sanctioned a disciplinary warning.
in a simplified hearing, the board heard testimony and reviewed documentation regarding and alleged violation of regulations 4, 13B, 13C, 13I, and 15 by students A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O. After deliberation the board found all students under 21 responsible for violating regulation 13B, nobody responsible for 13C, and 13I, and students A, and B specifically responsible for violating regulation 15, and student C responsible for violating regulation 4. All students responsible for violations were issued a Disciplinary Warning.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that student A violated Section II, Regulations 13b and 15 of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found Student A responsible for violating Regulations 13b and 15 and recommended that Student A be sanctioned with a disciplinary warning and other educational sanctions.
Regulation 13h – Medical Amnesty
In a joint student administrative hearing, the board considered allegations regarding an alleged violation of CNAC 13H by the student. The board believes that the best way for this to happen is for the student to serve a suspension during the 2026-2027 academic year. After considering all of the factors involved in this incident, the board found the student responsible for the alleged violations and have placed the student on a suspension for the full 2026-2027 academic year.
Regulation 14 – Failure to Comply
Regulation 15 – Department Regulations
Regulation 15c – Smoking in Residence
In a simplified hearing of the CSB, the board considered testimony and evidence regarding an alleged violation of CNAC Section 2 regulation 15. Smoking. The student pled not responsible for the violations. After consideration the board found the student not responsible.
Regulation 15d – Quiet Street Noise
In a simplified Honor board hearing, the board considered allegations that Student E violated Section II regulation 15d of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The Board found student E responsible and recommended that the student refrain from large gatherings in the future.
In a simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that students A, B, C, and D violated Section II, Regulations 15, 15, & 9(D) of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found all students responsible for violating Regulations 15, 15 & 9(D) and recommends disciplinary warning and other educational sanctions.
In a Simplified hearing, the board considered allegations that Students A, B, C, D, and E violated Section II, Regulation 15 of the Wesleyan University Code of Non-Academic Conduct. The board found Student E not responsible for the violation, and Students A, B, C, and D responsible for violating regulation 15, and recommended these students to be sanctioned with a Disciplinary Warning.